Wednesday, November 28, 2012

The Most Tragic Element of Hamlet


Shakespearean tragedies are five act plays that revolve around the downfall of a heroic figure whose death affects the welfare of the empire. The hero’s sudden reversal of fate and tragic flaw leads to his downfall. The protagonist struggles with external and internal conflicts as he undergoes abnormal physiological conditions. Shakespeare incorporates supernatural beings, such as ghosts or witches, in order to add to the excitement of the plot. He increases interest in his plays through the use of contrast. For instance, before a tragic scene, he incorporates comic relief in order to balance out the audience’s emotions. Shakespeare also includes characters that provide contrast to the protagonist. http://kilby.sac.on.ca/faculty/KRAMON/English/Grade%2010%20Files/Macbeth%20Files/Characteristics%20of%20a%20Shakespearean%20tragedy.htm

What separates Hamlet from other tragedies is his delay in taking action to avenge his own father’s murder. He says he wants to “know a thou a more horrid hent” (3.3.93). Hamlet reasons that he should find a better moment to murder Claudius and should not murder him as he prays because he is concerned he will send his soul to heaven. This contrasts Laertes’s willingness to “cut [Hamlet’s] throat in church” (4.7.144) in order to avenge his fathers death. The fact that Shakespeare has Laertes and Fortinbras’s characters active in their steps towards revenge unlike Hamlet, agrees with Shakespeare’s style of including characters that provide contrast to the protagonist. In addition, like every tragedy hero, Hamlet's flaw works against him; he excecively thinks things through, which delays his revenge. 

In my opinion, I consider Hamlet's death the most tragic aspect of the play. I feel sympathetic for Hamlet because he is betrayed by all of his friends and relatives except Horatio. In my perspective, because he has an innocent personality, he is hesitant and afraid to take revenge. Even after he completes his deed, he dies and is not rewarded by getting what he deserves, the crown to the thrown. 

Thursday, November 8, 2012

To Be or Not To Be

Hamlet's "To Be or Not to Be...." (3.1.64-99) soliloquy is one of Shakespeare most prominent works. Till this day, experts on Shakespeare, including Michael Almereyda and Franco Zefferelli, have come up with different interpretations of this monologue.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-YHMYkUrV7A
Almereyda's modern interpretation, takes place in a vacant Blockbuster store. As Hamlet walks down the aisle of action movies, it draws a line to Hamlets struggle to take the first step to avenge his fathers murder. The film playing in the background connects to the central theme of the soliloquy in that it references to death.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdp6dpiK8Ko
In my opinion, I prefer Zeferelli's interpretation of this soliloquy because it is a more purist version than Almereyda's play. Mel Gibson, who plays Hamlet, appears to be more consumed in his mind than modern Hamlet. As he performs this soliloquy in his fathers tomb, it is apparent he is repenting his fathers death.

Thursday, November 1, 2012

Rogue and Peasant Slave

     After hamlet delivers his "rogue and peasant slave" soliloquy, it is apparent that he has transformed from a passive to an active character. Hamlet wants to uncover the mystery behind his fathers murder because he is concerned that the ghost may be a devil is disguise.

     One quote in particular caught my eye in Hamlets soliloquy that followed the meeting the meeting of the actors. In the quote "What's Hecuba to him, or he to Hecuba, / That he should weep for her? What would he do / Had he the motive and the cue for passion / That I have?" (2.2.585-588), Hamlet aspires the passion the actor possesses. Hamlet criticizes himself for his inability to avenge his father's murder. He feels guilty that that actor can passionately cry his heart out for a fictional character and he himself has not taken the first step to avenge his fathers murder.  It is apparent that Hamlet wants to think in terms of an ideal hero. The actors passionate speech stirs hamlets drive to take revenge for his father death.



Thursday, October 11, 2012

First Impressions of Claudius


When Claudius is introduced in 1.2, he comes across as a suspicious sovereign. Throughout his speech, he uses antitheses such as "mirth"(1.2.12) and "dirge" (1.2.12) to degrade his suspicious actions. He degrades the severity of his brothers death, the late king and Hamlet, and his marriage that soon followed his brothers funeral to his sister-in-law, Gertrude. For instance, he explains how he married Gertrude for the "better wisdoms" (12.2.15) of the country.  This makes me question whether or not he murdered his brother as a means to take the throne or for his love for Gertrude. He quickly diverges from this matter in his speech, and notes that he will send Voltimand and Cornilius to Norway to give a letter to the King, Young Fortinbras’s uncle. He explains how he hopes the King of Norway will use his power to hinder his nephews plans to instigate war as revenge for his fathers death and the conquest of Norway by the late Hamlet. He makes note of this in his speech to come across as a good ruler trying to create diplomatic relations. However, he suspiciously wants Fortinbras to follow through with his plans and start a war with his weak army that Claudius can he can easily overcome with his powerful army. I predict that Claudius will continue to be a suspicious character throughout the play and as the story climaxes, it will eventually be revealed whether or not he murdered his brother.

Monday, October 1, 2012

Disadvantages of Societies Expectations of Women Explored in the Literary Works “Eveline” and “To the Ladies”



 “Eveline” by James Joyce and “To the Ladies” by Lady Mary Chudleigh both explore a similar theme of women’s expected role in society to be loyal to the male authority. “To the Ladies” is a poem written in the seventeenth century in which the author urges women to resist entering into a subservient position through marriage. “Eveline” also deals with harmful domestic expectations by telling a tragic story of a daughter’s obligations to her dysfunctional family at the cost of her own happiness. These two texts demonstrate how society’s expectations of women to be subservient homemakers for men are externally imposed. In both texts, the authors show how women have the choice to accept or rebel against these expectations, and ultimately, how conforming to these expectations significantly hinders women’s ability to be free from the male domination of their destinies.

In “To the Ladies”, Chudleigh explains how gender expectations are externally imposed on women through the legal contract of marriage. The author refers to marriage as a “fatal knot” (Chudleigh 3) and says that marriage makes “man by law supreme” (Chudleigh 6). The poem depicts the seventeenth century wife as relinquishing her personal voice. She instead treats her husband like an “eastern prince” (Chudleigh 9) who has supreme authority enforced by law. The obedient wife is expected to make no actions on her own accord but only those that “her haughty lord thinks fit” (Chudleigh19). Chudleigh’s poem portrays the socially accepted, yet very uneven dynamics in the relationship between men and women in the sixteen hundreds.
Similar to Chudleigh, Joyce shows how women’s familial expectations are imposed externally in his short story “Eveline”. The protagonist makes a promise to her dying mother “to keep the home together as long as she could" (Joyce 411). This indicates her expectations to keep the house in pristine condition and care for her family. This promise came at a hefty cost to her personal happiness: “She had hard work to keep the house together and to see that the two young children who had been left to her charge went to school regularly and got their meals regularly” (Joyce 411). As a daughter, Eveline is expected to be the sole caretaker of her siblings, her house, and her father. In addition to nurturing her family, she is expected to support her father financially  and “always [give] her entire wages” (Joyce 410) to him.. The nature of the imposition of expectations on women differs in “Eveline” from “To the Ladies” in that Eveline is obligated to her family while in the later text, the wives are expected to serve and obey their husbands. In addition, Eveline is born into the expectations imposed by her family unlike the wives in “To the Ladies” who willingly enter the “nuptial contract” (Chudleigh 12).
The seventeenth century women in Chudleigh’s poem work with their societal expectation to be subservient to men when they enter into marriage and allow their husbands control their fate. With a negative voice, Chudleigh explains how marriage in her century is not about true love, but instead focuses on emphasizing that a wife is expected to comply with her husband’s regulations. Chudleigh further laments that the wives allow themselves to “be governed by a nod, / and fear [their]  husband as [their] god” (Chudleigh 15-16). The women in Chudleigh’s era consent to their treatment as servants by their husbands. Although these women are not born into male authority contracts like Eveline, if they resist to conform to the expectations imposed by society, Chudleigh implies that they will be social outcastes despised not just by men, but all of society.
Unlike the wives in 17th century England, Eveline initially does not give into the external expectations imposed by her family. She plans to escape her father’s control and violence by running off to Buenos Aires with her lover, Frank, who was a sailor. Even though “her father had found out the affair and had forbidden her to have anything to say to him” (Joyce 411), she continues to meet Frank clandestinely. Eveline wants to have her destiny in her own hands and build her own family and home by escaping her troubled past. “The pitiful vision of her mother’s life” (Joyce 411) worries her of her own future and makes her want to break the cycle of women’s maltreatment in her family. Like the wives in Chudleigh’s poem, as a woman, Eveline is expected to have a life filled with “commonplace sacrifices” (Joyce 411). However, unlike the wives in the poem, Eveline is determined to create a new pattern of female treatment within her family by escaping to Buenos Aires with a man who respects her.
Just as Eveline first chooses to rebel against the expectations of her family, Chudleigh as an author defies her society’s expectations of women in her era. Her voice is explicitly understood in the last lines of her poem. The very act of writing a pro-feminist poem in the 17th century displays that Chudleigh is actively defying those expectations of women. The title of the poem “To the Ladies” indicates that the author intends to write this poem as a message to women in her era. She urges wives to work against the expectations, inflicted upon them by society, to be like a servant to their husbands. In the final stanza, Chudleigh urges wives to  “value [themselves], and men despise: / [They] must be proud, if [they’ll] be wise” (Chudleigh 23-24). Her use of the imperative tense in the final stanza emphasizes the urgency with which she seeks to change the society in which she lives. In this way, she inserts her own plea to her contemporary women to regain their pride despite the potential social backlash.
In this way, Chudleigh would argue against Eveline’s final decision to conform to the expectations imposed by her family. Even though Eveline initially decides to gain her freedom and live to her potential, her sense of family duty takes over and she gives in to her externally imposed expectations as a daughter. In her last steps onto the ship, which will sail her to freedom from her abusive father, she suddenly becomes “passive, like a helpless animal. Her eyes gave him no sign of love or farewell or recognition” (Joyce 412). Joyce’s reference to an animal indicates how Eveline’s soul becomes like an animal’s, without free will. This treatment of women as abused animals draws a line to the wives in Chudleigh’s poem who obey their male authority.
Both Chudleigh and Joyce display how the expectations of women in society ultimately hinders the development of individual woman from realizing their potential happiness. Chudleigh emphatically implies that society’s gender expectations ultimately hamper women’s empowerment. Furthermore, she shows how marriage degrades women because in marriage “ all that’s kind is laid aside / And nothing [is] left but state and pride” (Chudleigh 7-8). The lack of emotional happiness in a marriage reveals that in this era, marriage is a business transaction in which women are treated more like objects than loving wives. Similarly, Joyce uses Eveline’s character to clearly portray that gender expectations significantly hinders Eveline’s development into an independent women. Instead of choosing her freedom, the end of the story implies that she returns to her abusive lifestyle in which “she sometimes felt herself in danger of her father’s violence” (Joyce 410). However, it is interesting to note that even if Eveline chooses to escape to Buenos Aires with her lover, Frank, she would still be dependent upon a man to save her: “He would give her life, perhaps love too. But she wanted to live” (Joyce 412). Joyce’s stance on marriage reinforces Chudleigh’s criticism that women rely too much on their husbands.
Even though women today are considered to have by far more freedom than in Chudleigh’s and Joyce’s eras, women are still faced with unfair expectations. Like the wives in Chudleigh’s era and the protagonist in Joyce’s short story, Eveline, women today are still faced with disadvantages compared to men due to societal norms. For instance, though modern society encourages women to pursue a career, women are simultaneously expected to be the primary homemaker and nurturer of carchildren. This therefore makes it a challenge for women to succeed in their careers because they typically have to juggle between their domestic life and profession. Women ought to take Chudleigh’s advice to “be proud, if [they’ll] be wise” (Chudleigh 24) and continue their struggle for equality.






Wednesday, September 19, 2012

"The Unknown Citizen" & "Eveline"

The poem "Miniver Cheevy", by Edward Arlington Robinson, is a poem regarding a "child of scorn" (778) that "wept that he was ever born" (Robinson 778). Miniver has self pity and no self worth. He blames the world for his underachievement's and his poverty. He wishes that he had lived during the Medieval period and that if he lived in this era, he would be more successful. His interpretations of the medieval times as a flourishing period in history is based off the legend and folk talks he hears of Camelot, which never actually existed. He doesn't realize that the medieval period was actually a catastrophic period in history with starvation and plagues. Miniver's name suits him because it includes the word mini which represents his small mindedness. Miniver doesn't realize that he is wasting his chances of gaining success by drinking, not getting a job, always complaining about his problems, and always thinking of what he does not have. In addition, if he lived in the Medieval times he would still be in the same situation of being stuck and not taking the responsibility for his actions to progress in life. This poem is ironic because as Miniver believes that if he had instead lived in the Medeivel times, he would have been more successful. He is wasting his chances of becoming successful by choosing to drink as an alcoholic.

Eveline is a story about a young woman who wants to escape her abused life in Dublin and move to Buenos Aires with her lover Frank. She can no longer handle her father's physical and mental abuse. She believes that life is better anywhere else besides were she currently resides. The only problem is that she struggles to undergo this change and start a new life. 

The theme of "Eveline" and "Miniver Cheevy" are similar because they both discuss the ideas that people always believe that the "grass is always greener on the other side" and wanting more, but not working hard for achievement. Both Eveline and Miniver are trapped in this dilemma and believe that their life will no longer be unfulfilling if they lived in a different place or time period in history.

Friday, September 14, 2012

"The Waking" & "The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas"


Roethke conveys many life lessons in his poem, "The Waking". In the first line of the Waking, "I learn by going where I have to go", means that death is inevitable.  We should therefore make the most of what life has to offer.   In comparison to the rest of the poem, it seems that the poet feels it is his obligation to explore as much as he can about the world given the short amount of time he has left on earth.  In contrast to the last line, in the first stanza the poet realizes that death is like a step away, so he therefore appreciates the opportunity given to him to have set foot onto earth.  In the second stanza, “I hear my being dance from ear to ear", the poet is on a journey to understand as much as possible about what life has to offer before the last journey to the eternal destiny.  In stanza 3, he is truly grateful for being surrounded by loved ones, and treasures mother nature for being so good to him. In the fourth stanza, the poet is trying to convey to the reader to accept the challenges that life has to offer just as a "lowly worm [struggles as it] climbs up a winding stair". In the final line, "I learn by going where I have to go", the poet loves the opportunity given to grow as he journeys through life. Roethke is willing to accept the challenges life has to offer and take the path in life he has to take and accepts the challenges that may come with it versus the one he wants to take. In this last line the poet teaches us that is our mission to find our purpose in life.  The process of finding our purpose in life takes a lot of dedication given the short amount of time we have on earth. 

In "The Ones Who Walk Away Ffrom Omelas", we see that societies are not appreciative of what they have, and they feel that luxury can be achieved only by torturing and dehumanizing the feeble.  The ones who left were the strong ones who were against all this cruelty.  The gave up, all of their luxuries in order to save a person from torture.  It was their own decision to leave in order to find a more purposeful and meaningful life free of guilt. The ones who walk away from Omelas's society display the theme in "The Waking" because despite their mind telling them to stay, because it is difficult to let go of luxuries, their heart told them to leave because it is the moral thing to do and it is therefore the path in life they "have" to take.